«Dear professor, I am an almost eighty-year-old grandfather, but I take the liberty of writing them for the student I have been and for the gratitude I feel by reading the articles I get for two of my first and third year granddaughters. The point is this, you go back to school (perhaps) and the messages that come from the professors are: “We will finally check - all subjects and all together - and since it is a normal year, there will be failures and debts ". I take the mistrust, also offensive for those who have worked hard all year, and perhaps indifference to what young people have experienced. So my granddaughters would prefer to stay home this last month, despite having always wanted to go back to school. These professors remind me of Jannacci's dedication to the song The Judgment of God: “To those who witness epochal events, but he does not notice it!”, perhaps they do not know how to seize the right time that also requires change ". I thank this grandfather who reminded me that in recent months we have not lost votes but lives, not pieces of the program but of growth, and the threat cannot be an adult's response. Knowledge does not grow in fear of verification, but in the joy of discovery. It is also a question of chemistry, in fact the blood is collected where it is needed: joy involves the whole body and especially the chest and head; fear instead only the chest, the brain becomes paralyzed. We should ask ourselves: if I couldn't leverage fear to get the kids to study, studierebbero?

Intelligence grows in a low-high direction (body-brain), right left (hemisphere of the brain dedicated to emotions / imagination / creativity and hemisphere dedicated to calculation / analysis / procedures). At school, the transmission model is often overturned: left right (know that the Odyssey has 24 chapters is more important than reading them), high Low (explaining a poem comes before experiencing it). Therefore, fear is used to force an unnatural path, which summons body and emotions in a reactive and inactive way. It's like training someone for a run by chasing a mad dog, instead of growing, day to day, the pleasure of running and improving with all the commitment it requires. In a system where the final grade is the average - unfortunately little "weighted" (how to study in docimology), that is, giving different weights to the tests based on the course of the whole year and not just the second quarter - of the performances, the vote becomes the end of knowledge and is identified with life. Voting, on the other hand, is only a means to two purposes: quantify the acquisition of a specific goal and transform the error into a resource. If the vote becomes the goal, priority will be to get by (error is not a resource but a condemnation) and compete (cooperative learning with us is still little known or practiced). But getting by and competing are not the end of knowledge (in fact the "poor" remain poor and the "good" good). I am not suggesting a school with no grades (Over the years, however, I have learned the importance of combining judgment with voting: explain the mistake to make it a resource and highlight things well done), but in which the vote serves to grow and does not turn into a judgment on being ("You are your performance"). Faced with a low grade, a disciple undertakes to "do more" only if he knows he "is more" than the outcome. The assembly-line-school, identifying product and person, forget life (use the lexicon of financial statements: record, rating, academic performance / achievement, debit / credit, promotion / rejection), the school-shop, instead giving priority to the master-disciple relationship, aims to develop a unique style and create the masterpiece (vital lexicon: judgement, story of the boy, growth, strong / weak points, error / discovery).

To eliminate fear, each teacher will have to find strategies suitable for the age of the disciples and the subject. For example, I schedule checks and queries in advance, only in this way do they become a moment of discovery: I am not interested in finding out what the student does not know (I understand immediately if he has studied or not), but what can he find out from what he has studied (the more you study, even beyond the homework, and knows how to get organized, the more the test will gratify him), because I try to ask fruitful questions about the way the human brain discovers (going from the known to the unknown), questions that do not require closed answers to be repeated as I expect (training), but they invite us to make discoveries that can surprise me too (I have often had to enrich or rectify what I thought). Only in this way does the student become the protagonist of knowledge, the verification becomes a dialogue and the game after a lot of training. Fear is replaced by responsibility, anxiety from curiosity, the fatigue from the challenge. Let's take the fear out of this school month, which is not avoiding what must be done, but to recover lives and not just votes.

26 aprile 2021, 06:59 – edit the 2 may 2021 | 12:24

Adapted from: Corriere della Sera, Last bench.